Thursday, February 14, 2013

Protect my Planning Period


Freire advocates for Critical Pedagogy to engage students and teachers in “learning through teaching” relationships.  I agree that teaching is researching together with the students and their parents or guardians.  Teaching is praxis –which Freire equates with learning in the world and about the world, through reflection and action upon our immediate reality.-  Several authors such as Luis Moll and others have researched Funds of Knowledge and cultural capital, which could potentially aid teachers in engaging in meaningful learning with their students.  This is because in order to be an effective teacher, I must first learn about my student –and I learn that with my student.—In the process, I learn about effective ways to help the student discover and learn the subject I am teaching.   In such processes I inevitably learn more about myself and act to change, to modify, and to adapt.

During the USA Presidential Election Campaign in 2012, a candidate made an unfortunate comment expressing his disdain about a teacher’s choice to “help the student understand how he or she (student) learns.”  Most politicians have the nerve to legislate about education while knowing nothing about the subject.  In fact, one of the traits that separate effective learners from students who struggle is their ability to capitalize on their strengths while compensating for their weaknesses in the process of learning.  Understanding one’s learning styles is among the first steps to becoming a successful, effective learner.  Such understanding is more likely (and better) accomplished through interactions with someone who has a deep understanding of learning and the subject matter at point.

When I was teaching, I used my planning period to learn about my students through reviewing their work and talking with the students’ families.  I also thought about theories of education and human development.  I wrote extensive notes –and questions—to the students while keeping a teaching journal with events that transpired in class.  I examined test results and my comments on students’ progress and used such data to further teaching and learning activities in an outside the classroom.  I was able to plan thought-provocative activities to be conducted in the classroom.  I elicited the help of parents (or guardians) to engage in conversations that helped the student at his or her particular developmental stage –in terms of subject-matter standards and learning in general. 

Most teachers know there is more to teaching than what meets the eye.  Some of us refuse to play the role of babysitters that some administrators –and parents- want to impose us.  Yet, few people outside the teaching profession understand what is involved in teaching.  That’s why I cringed when the administrators insisted in using my planning period to conduct “school-wide businesses” such as those I have described elsewhere.  We teachers should be more vocal and show those who do not understand our teaching role that the teaching profession needs to be respected and given the time and resources we need to continue our work towards educating (yes, educating!) the children we are responsible to teach.